Six lectures, two decades of evidence, one organ at the centre of every IVF cycle — the 2024 Summer School puts the endometrium under the microscope, from luteal-phase progesterone to robotic embryo injection.
Apply mid-luteal progesterone monitoring in fresh transfers and choose between HRT, modified natural and NPP cycles in FRET.
Differentiate endometrial receptivity from selectivity in recurrent implantation failure rather than treating the endometrium as a binary on/off.
Interpret serum progesterone with a cut-off of 8.8-10 ng/mL on transfer day and add a second route when below threshold.
Position the ENMA test in the work-up of patients with recurrent implantation failure and act on dysbiotic profiles.
Recognise robotic, image-guided and microfluidic embryo transfer technology heading into first-in-human trials.
Evaluate AI tools for endometrial ultrasound, hysteroscopy, CD138 chronic endometritis detection and at-home hormonal screening.
Two decades of collaboration shaped today's IVF standards in the region — and the 2024 Summer School opens by acknowledging the people who built them. A short framing of the day ahead, focused entirely on the endometrium.
Why does luteal progesterone matter just as much in fresh cycles as in frozen? A walk-through of trigger choice, mid-luteal cut-offs and rescue strategies for the suboptimal corpus luteum — built on more than 15 years of randomised trials.

HRT, modified natural or true natural cycle — which preparation actually delivers the best obstetric outcomes? A practical synthesis of recent data on E2 duration, progesterone route and timing, day-of-transfer monitoring, and the new NPP protocol that may reshape weekend scheduling.

Open-floor Q&A following the fresh and frozen preparation talks. Live exchange on rectal vs subcutaneous progesterone rescue, oral dydrogesterone limits, dual stimulation, estradiol cut-offs and where E2 monitoring still adds clinical value in 2024.


Receptive or non-receptive? A continuum-based view of the endometrium as an active biosensor that selects against poor-quality embryos. Why the classical 'all in the egg' narrative misses recurrent implantation failure — and how a new diagnostic toolbox is taking shape.

Lactobacillus dominance, the ENMA test, and a personalised antibiotic-probiotic pathway: how far has the evidence for the endometrial microbiome come in IVF? Live-birth data, host-microbial interactions at the GPCR level, and what to do with a dysbiotic sample before transfer.

Open-floor Q&A on receptivity, selectivity and the microbiome. Discussion of sirolimus-class interventions, NK-cell modulation, probiotic strain specificity, and how to interpret an excess of Lactobacillus crispatus in the endometrium versus the vagina.



How much of IVF failure happens after the transfer catheter leaves the cervix? An unpublished preview of next-generation embryo transfer — robotic microfluidic injection into a defined endometrial pocket under image guidance, on the way to first-in-human trials.

From at-home hormonal screening and ultrasound classifiers to CD138 detection in chronic endometritis and endometrium-on-chip — a tour of where artificial intelligence already adds value across the IVF cycle, and where its real limits sit today.


Co-author of the course "Endometrial preparation, receptivity and emerging tech in IVF."
Professor Peter Humaidan is Professor in Reproductive Endocrinology at the Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital, Aarhus University, Denmark. He is internationally recognized for his work in individualized ovarian stimulation, ovulation triggering, and luteal phase physiology, and is co-founder of both the POSEIDON concept and the APHRODITE criteria.
Educational use only. This program is provided by Sona Academy for educational and informational purposes for healthcare professionals and students only. It is not intended for patients or the general public, is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment, and is not intended to promote the use of any products.
Funding & editorial independence. The sponsor does not participate in or influence the selection, development or content of the program. The content is developed by the speaker, and the opinions expressed are the speaker's and do not necessarily reflect those of Sona Academy or the sponsor.
Jurisdictional differences. Laws, regulations and ethical standards governing medical practice vary by country, and not all methods or techniques presented may be permissible in every jurisdiction. Users are responsible for ensuring compliance with all laws, regulations, licensing requirements and professional standards applicable in their jurisdiction.
The speakers have declared no relevant conflicts of interest in relation to this presentation.


Tell us which topics matter most to You, which learning formats You prefer, and which speakers You would like to hear from. Complete the short survey and influence future educational initiatives of Sona Academy.