Why does the corpus luteum still matter when we transfer in HRT? A walk through 40+ years of LH-progesterone evidence, three studies (two fundamental, one practical) on luteal-phase support, and where the 22+ existing FET protocols separate into corpus-luteum-supported and corpus-luteum-free strategies.


MD, PhD
First Deputy Director General of the «Mother and Child» Medical Center in Kyiv. Candidate of Medical Sciences (PhD), obstetrician-gynecologist and specialist in reproductive medicine.
Why the corpus luteum still matters when transfer happens in HRT. A walk through 40+ years of LH-progesterone evidence — including L'Correli's 1984 study and pulsatile LH measurement at 10-minute intervals — and the structural split between FET protocols with and without a corpus luteum.
Corpus luteum function depends on LH pulsatility — after every pulse there is a progesterone response 40 minutes later. There are more than 22 published luteal-phase support protocols, which sort into two groups: corpus-luteum-supported (natural cycle, modified natural, NPP) and corpus-luteum-free (HRT). The corpus-luteum-free group is associated with higher rates of preeclampsia, hypertensive disorders, postpartum haemorrhage and preterm birth.
Natural cycle requires more monitoring and limits weekend scheduling. Some patients cannot be moved to natural cycle (anovulation, severe endometriosis). The HRT vs natural cycle obstetric outcome differences are observational; randomised data are still emerging.
First Deputy Director General of the «Mother and Child» Medical Center in Kyiv. Candidate of Medical Sciences (PhD), obstetrician-gynecologist and specialist in reproductive medicine.
Author of the lecture "Hormonal Architecture of Frozen Embryo Transfer: Role of LH in HRT and Natural Cycle"