
Nataliia Vladykina covers the basics — controlled ovarian stimulation as a craft whose mastery lies in constantly weighing whether what you do will bring more benefit or more harm.
The first question a clinician must answer before starting is why to stimulate. For natural conception the goal is monofollicular growth; for IUI, growing a few follicles is acceptable; for oocyte accumulation, freezing or embryo creation, the logic differs. Without a clear goal a protocol loses meaning.
The second step is the patient profile. By AMH, FSH and antral follicle count she is loosely classed as a normo-, hypo- or hyper-responder. These tools are not absolute and give no exact answer, but they help avoid trouble and choose a starting strategy.
The third choice is what to stimulate with: direct drugs (exogenous FSH) or indirect stimulants (clomiphene citrate, letrozole). Each has pros and cons; recent data lean toward letrozole, but in Ukraine its off-label status matters — hence the advice on a well-considered informed consent.
Basic protocols with indirect stimulants are reviewed: starting on day 5-6, closer to dominant-follicle selection, raises the chance of monofollicular growth. An important warning: clomiphene for longer than 5 days shifts the implantation window, making natural conception in that cycle problematic — a typical "protocol error."
The hardest stimulation, the speaker says, is for natural conception, where follicle and endometrial growth must be synchronised. If synchronisation fails, segmentation is wiser: retrieve oocytes and prepare the endometrium separately.
A separate case: patients not responding to indirect drugs. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism needs exogenous FSH in small doses to achieve monofollicular growth and avoid an excessive response. An indicative dose table is given by AMH, FSH, follicle count, age and BMI.
Three classes of drug frame any ART protocol: blockers of a premature LH surge, follicle-growth drugs and final-maturation drugs. It is their combination that distinguishes basic protocols from one another.
Long and short protocols contrast in logic: the long one first switches off the patient's own regulation, then turns on external control; the short one (with antagonists) pushes the whole cohort up at once and then triggers. The long protocol allows more timing flexibility, the short one is tied more tightly to the clock.
The trigger is given when follicles reach roughly 18 mm (smaller in older patients). Maturation is commanded either by an LH-like drug (hCG) or by an agonist that releases the patient's own LH; the difference in duration of action is crucial for preventing complications.
The lecture closes with protocol individualisation and the place of AI: modern platforms suggest an optimal protocol from patient data — in the case discussed (36 years, AMH 0.7) an AI model built on tens of thousands of protocols proposed a solution that produced a euploid embryo and a pregnancy. The overall conclusion: a correctly chosen starting FSH dose gives a better final oocyte yield, and changing it mid-cycle without cause is unwise.
Master the fundamentals before adding complexity. Agonist and antagonist protocols, choice of gonadotropins and starting dose, individualisation to ovarian reserve — the systematic toolkit every stimulation programme starts from.